NHS Plans for Local Hospitals are "Fatally Flawed"

Former NHS Chief is urging NHS North West London to think again

Related Links

Full Report by Timothy Rideout

QPR Stars are Latest to Join A&E Campaign

Fulham FC Footballers Join Fight Against Local A&E Closures

Safe in Our Hands - Keep A&E at Chelsea and Westminster

#safeinourhands

Ten reasons why you should support the campaign

Factsheet - what the proposals mean for Hammersmith and Fulham residents

Public Anger Builds over A&E Closures

Residents Vow to Fight A&E Closures

Meeting over NHS Closures Set for Rivercourt Church

Save Hammersmith and Fulham Hospitals

#savehfnhs

Save Charing Cross

Save Hammersmith

Statement on Closures from MP Andy Slaughter

Save Charing Cross Online Petition

Council Issues Angry Response to Proposed NHS Closures

Shock NHS Report Proposes Closure of Local A&Es

Shaping a Healthier Future

NHS North West London

Participate

Register for the Shepherd's Bush Newsletter

Get the Hammersmith newsletter

Register for the Fulham Newsletter

 

NHS plans to downgrade West London hospitals are fatally flawed and will compromise local health services, according to a damning independent report released this week.

Former NHS chief executive, Timothy Rideout, says there are fundamental flaws in NHS North West London’s controversial plans to scrap the A&E departments at Hammersmith and Charing Cross Hospitals, as well as the hyper acute stroke unit at Charing Cross.

In a scathing report, Mr Rideout - who is a specialist in change management, financial strategy and organisational turnaround within the health service, spells out a series of major concerns in the NHS business case. These include:

  • A failure to explore genuine alternatives to A&E closures.
  • Evidence that the “over-provision” of A&E departments, that NHS North West London claims to justify the closure of four units in the area, is not as marked as claimed. Nationally an average A&E department caters for 259,425 people. In North West London around 247,150 people are currently served per A&E (just 5% less than the national average). But, if the current NHS proposals go ahead, the remaining A&E’s would each need to cater for 395,440 people - meaning the area would have 52% less capacity than the national average.
  • Using location as the main factor to decide downgrade options, rather than more relevant issues such as: the needs of local people or the current performance of local hospitals. For example, Charing Cross has the lowest mortality rate in North West London and the highest satisfaction score from patients, but this was not one of the criteria considered.
  • Failure to independently verify the financial modelling used to determine the level of savings that the NHS needs to make.
  • The ‘funnel effect’ of the chosen methodology in knocking out viable alternatives before they had a chance to be fairly compared.
  • Lack of regard for the 40 per cent of inpatient admissions and 23 per cent of A&E admissions - people who will be dramatically affected by downgrading local hospitals.

Mr Rideout says the process that NHS North West London chose to decide that the borough’s two hospitals should be downgraded is "unsafe" - and that, therefore, so are the proposals.

" There are fundamental problems with the whole business case used by NHS North West London," says Mr Rideout.
" There is a complete failure to take account of current clinical outcomes and a lack of regard for the scale of impact these radical changes will have on Hammersmith & Fulham residents."

The excellence of current services will be put at risk as residents will be faced with increased travel times and delayed access to emergency care, according to the report. All this is combined with an inadequate public consultation earlier this year while the proposals were being drawn up - with just one in every 5,000 residents consulted.

Despite receiving MORE funding from central government, NHS North West London is ploughing ahead with budget savings of 4 per cent per year.

Cllr Nicholas Botterill, Hammersmith & Fulham (H&F) Council Leader, says: “The Rideout Report is a devastating critique of the failure of NHS bureaucrats to spend the extra cash that they are getting from Government to improve and protect front line health services.

“Instead, this detailed review shows how the unaccountable NHS bureaucrats have attempted to justify the downgrading of two local hospitals in the face of massive opposition from patients with no firm evidence that nurses or GPs agree with their wild conclusions."

The report also warns that the removal of 1,000 adult beds should not go ahead before new NHS structures come in to effect in April 2013, as it would be "highly inappropriate for formal decisions to be taken by Primary Care Trust on the eve of their abolition".

The report goes on to argue that major changes should not even be considered until the capacity of primary and community care, under the Out of Hospitals strategy, has been significantly beefed up.

Cllr Botterill continues: " NHS North West London has failed to adequately consult the council, GPs or patients. They have basically rigged the consultation to favour predetermined outcomes with little or no evidence to back up their assertions. As a result, their so call preferred option of downgrading Charing Cross and Hammersmith Hospitals is fatally flawed.

" To add insult to injury, under the current timetable, a dying organisation in the form of the current PCT is scheduled to make a major decision on the future health and wellbeing of thousands of residents as its last act before being dismantled. If this is allowed to continue there will be no accountability and no one to blame when lives are lost.

"We will now re-double our efforts to persuade the NHS North West London to think again."

Timothy Rideout was brought in to help scrutinise NHS plans to downgrade local hospitals by H&F Council. Mr Rideout has more than 20 years experience in senior roles within the health service and was formally appointed to assist by the council’s Housing Health and Adult Social Care Select Committee in July.

You can read the full report here.

Residents have already responded angrily the NHS proposals. A group which includes residents and Andy Slaughter has launched a campaign, Save Hammersmith and Fulham Hospitals, with a website and plans to join a march on Parliament in September 15.

The campaign has its own twitter hashtag #SaveHFNHS and an independent petition which aims to get 10,000 signatures and is planning to offer advice on the NHS Consultation on the plans which it calls Shaping a Healthier Future.

H&F Council has also been running a campaign against the proposals – joined by a broad coalition of politicians, businesses and residents from a range of backgrounds – and has warned that local people will be left dangerously far away from emergency care out of borough, if the NHS plans go ahead.

The council has organised a public scrutiny meeting on September 18 where hospital bosses will take questions from residents and a panel of experts. The council has also appointed a former NHS Chief Executive, Tim Rideout, to help scrutinise the NHS business case.

The Save Our Hospitals public meeting is at Hammersmith Town Hall on Tuesday, September 18 at 7pm.

You can also add your signature to the petitions at Save Charing Cross and Save Hammersmith.

This meeting is followed by a consultation roadshow in Fulham held by the NHS the following day, September 19 from 2pm till 8pm at Fulham Broadway Methodist Church, 452 Fulham Road.

The NHS Consultation, Shaping a Healthier Future lasts until October 8 and you can respond to the consultation online or request a full copy of the consultation document by emailing consultation@nw.london.nhs.uk, calling freephone number 0800 881 5209 or writing to FREEPOST SHAPING A HEALTHIER FUTURE CONSULTATION (This must be written in capital letters and on one line. You will not need a stamp.)

August 30, 2012